Skip Nav

Same-Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay

Arguments for Same Sex Marriages

❶From the African-Americans to gays, minorities have struggled to find their voice and their rights in America; however, these groups have still found a way to progressively alter public conceptualization of their place in society. Though some people are against same-sex marriages for religious reasons, not allowing same-sex marriages is discrimination.

“Liberty and justice for all?”

Get free study materials
The legal definition of marriage: Why rely on the Bible?
Support Human’s Freedoms

It was not until the rise of Christianity that a negative attitude towards same-sex marriage became introduced. The belief that marriage was based on procreation and any relationship that was non-procreative began to increase in many societies. Japanese Buddhism records the most tolerant attitude toward homosexuality, praising it for its mystery. Today, there are no religious or political limitations on homosexual behavior in Japan. Sexuality is considered a private matter and lacks any restrictions.

Other things, such as mixed race relationships were considered more offensive than homosexuality. Random History also explains how in the thirteenth century, the first laws banning sodomy were introduced and were strictly enforced. Through the next centuries, homosexual behavior became deviant and was punished. Due to the belief that homosexual behavior was wrong, the belief that heterosexual relationships were normal became popular among the majority of countries.

By the nineteenth century, heterosexuality became the most believed standard for relationships. Although the debate for same-sex marriage became noticeably public in the late twentieth century, it was not until during a Hawaiian case, that the issue became national news. The ruling of the case stated that the restriction of marriage and its benefits to opposite-sex couples were unconstitutional.

By that same year, a majority of states passed laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. Since then, states have defined their own definition of marriage. Despite the fact that the debate over same-sex marriage is relatively new in the United States, five states have made same-sex marriage legal, as well as Washington D. In California, the marriage is only recognized if it was before proposition 8. Ballot Pedias research explains how proposition 8 is a statewide ballot proposition in California.

The people of California voted for the illegalization of same-sex marriage. Though some people are against same-sex marriages for religious reasons, not allowing same-sex marriages is discrimination. Same-sex marriages should be legalized because the discrimination same-sex couples receive is emotionally traumatic, and unfair. The most influential reason against same-sex marriage is based on religion. Many people believe that procreation is the ideal reason for marriage.

Their belief is that same-sex couples do not have the capability to produce children which is the basis for marriage. However, when two of the most influential religious icons discussed marriage, child bearing was not a reason for two people to get married. Both men stressed how the quality of a relationship was the most important aspect for marriage. If marriage is reserved for having a child, then same-sex marriages are not an issue.

Many same-sex couples employ artificial insemination to conceive a child. The two have a 21 year old daughter by artificial insemination. People marry each other. Sullivan also states how the church has blessed fields when crops have been planted, MX missiles, new houses, and warships whose sole purpose is to kill and destroy. There is no reason the church should not bless a relationship in which two people vow to be faithful and love each other for all eternity.

Supporters of same-sex marriage believe the bill to allow same-sex marriage should be crafted in a specific way that will help win votes from people of faith. If the bill was written and carried out in a certain way, the church would not have any association with same-sex couples getting married because the process would be carried out in a courtroom.

By the government prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married, they are denying them rights that every other American has. There are numerous rights and responsibilities that are associated with marriage. Same-sex couples are being discriminated against because they are not allowed any of these rights. Social Security benefits upon death, disability or retirement of spouse, as well as benefits for minor children, workers' compensation protections for the family of a worker injured on the job, exemptions from estate taxes when a spouse dies, exemptions from federal income taxes on spouse's health insurance are all denied to same-sex couples.

The discrimination and denial of marriage and its benefits of same-sex couples can be emotionally traumatic at times. Conservatives believe that the ideal family includes one father and one mother. Both of the parents influence their children in a certain way. Many believe that a same-sex couple cannot raise a child properly because the child is not raised with both fatherly and motherly qualities.

However, Sullivan also discusses how even though some parents may be disappointed that their child will not produce a grandchild, they would still prefer to see their child find someone to love and live with and share his or her life with. If a child is surrounded by two parents who love them, they will develop and grow as any other child would.

Many states have legalized civil unions since Although civil unions provide legal protection to same-sex couples, they are only recognized at the state level. Many believe legalizing same-sex marriage is not an urgent issue because civil unions are becoming legal in more states.

There is a vast amount of differences in a marriage and civil union. Civil unions are unequal because they are not recognized state to state. A same-sex couple in a civil union is denied the all of the rights that come with marriage. Also, civil unions do not receive any federal benefit. The debate over same-sex marriage will forever rage until it becomes legalized. Same-sex relationships have been a part of history since the ancient times.

Not allowing same-sex marriage is discrimination. Couples are denied financial benefits heterosexual couples receive. What is the question of same-sex marriage if not a direct request to have these uniquely American values defended? Allowing gays to marry is a critical step this country needs to take in order to progress culturally, economically, and globally as leaders in a more tolerant and peaceful world.

The most fundamental issue when addressing same-sex marriage is the definition of marriage itself. A universally accepted definition has yet to be established because marriage is a delicate entanglement of personal intimacy and public declaration.

Above all, we as a society tend to value our freedom to choose the one we marry based on romance and compatibility—an instinctual desire to love and be loved. We have largely developed the concept of marriage to include a formal union that joins a man and a woman who desire to be considered one entity under the law Poulter. This definition is precise and reflects the perception put forth by Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Therefore, much of the opposition to same-sex marriage is rooted in the Bible and its ethical code.

James Dobson, an anti-gay marriage advocate and evangelical Christian psychologist and author, frequently references the Bible as the foundation for his argument. This reflects his biggest concern about the legalization of same-sex marriage: The moral implications of same-sex marriage are ethically perverse and would only pave the way for additional sexual promiscuity Dobson. What they fail to distinguish, however, is the fundamental difference between Canon and Common law.

The United States has always differentiated between church and state ; therefore, the Constitution and the Bible are not, in this country, lawfully equivalent. Because of our first amendment rights to freedom of religion, not everyone has to believe in God and thereby abide by His rules.

An additional—and powerful—source of same-sex marriage support comes from the somewhat surprising field of business. As Supreme Court oral arguments commence, many businesses have begun to voice their advocacy. Because some states have legalized the unions of homosexual couples, the payroll systems and different tax treatments become a legal headache for employers.

Section three of the Defense of Marriage Act DOMA restricts gay couples from over one thousand federal benefits, including the right to file a joint tax return. And according to noted NPR commentator and proponent of gay rights Jonathon Rauch, it would have human asset significance as well: It is a known sociological and anthropological fact that societies are fluid and dynamic.

Cultural shifts are inevitable—social norms evolve and conform accordingly. Our founding fathers recognized this and planned appropriately by constructing the framework of our government to aptly deal with changes in societal norms and ideologies. History tells us change is like eating your vegetables—met first by resistance and then swallowed with time.

I believe that this is why the issue of same-sex marriage is not only significant in terms of tolerance and civil liberties, but also for future sociocultural questions that deal with the changing mentality regarding relationships and love. Traditional values do not need to be compromised, only progressively reinforced and altered if necessary. For that reason alone, gay Americans should have the constitutional ability to marry.

The supreme court ruled in June of that denying same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. This ruling established gay marriage as legal in all fifty states. However, the ruling did not stop states from trying to disobey the court order by denying marriage licenses. For example, a local county marriage clerk from Kansas, Kim Davis, was caught on video denying a marriage license to a same-sex couple.

It stirred a nationwide debate regarding the supreme court's ruling. Minnesota Citizens in Defense of Marriage. Wiley Online Library, 18 Jan. This blog post is provided free of charge and we encourage you to use it for your research and writing. However, we do require that you cite it properly using the citation provided below in MLA format.

Arguments Against Same Sex Marriages

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

The Gay Marriage Debate - Within this essay, the main focus will be to develop a thorough analysis and discussion in relation to the topic of gay marriage.

Privacy FAQs

Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage. King Grammar and Composition lesson 75 Argumentative Essay on Gay Marriage Marriage is the ceremonial binding of two people, male and female, into one couple. Historically, marriage has been the institution when a man and a woman join together with the promise of love, devotion, to always .

About Our Ads

Gay marriage has divided the American people over the past few years. Yet such a sharp divide is a very recent occurrence. Only a decade ago, gay marriage was nil but an afterthought on the plates of many U.S. leaders.4/5(12). of same-sex marriage. This paper will contend that acceptance of same-sex marriage will require changes in public attitudes. For biological, historical, and religious reasons, marriage has The movement towards same-sex marriage grew out of gay liberation, surprisingly near in time to its watershed event in the U.S., the Stonewall riots in

Cookie Info

Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now! Gay marriage is also referred to as same sex marriage. Same sex relationships occur when men and women are attracted to someone of the same gender as themselves. According to many opponents, gay marriages can be described as more of the abandonment of gender distinctions because one cannot have same sex marriage while.