This supports the thesis, because if the reader were to become sympathetic with Mme. At first, Moupassant has Mme. Loisel always feeling bad for herself for not being married into a better, more highly regarded family. The husband is shown to be a good man, always trying to please his wife, but to no avail.
This becomes clear when the husband comes home one evening with an invitation to a very select event that he thinks will make her happy. Loisel is unappreciative and frets about how she has nothing proper to wear to such a thing. At last, she has a nice dress and a fine necklace and has a grand time at the event. This is the end of her first struggle with self-image.
Then, when the necklace is lost, she begins a new struggle with her self image to save her self from being seen as a thief. She and her husband go through great lengths to buy a replacement necklace and are forced to sacrifice many of their previous comforts.
After ten years of living as one of the poor she still wishes to be held with higher regard, of any sort. When she sees her old friend, she tells her the story of how she lost the necklace and bought her friend a new one, only to discover that the necklace was made of paste and more or less worth very little. Thus, the last ten years Mme. Loisel struggled as one of the poor to help pay off the replacement necklace and save her self from being called a thief, were in vain.
Moupassant uses this story to express that one should not wish for more than what they have, but to be thankful for it. But up to now he hasn't been a creator, only a destroyer. Forests keep disappearing, rivers dry up, wild life's become extinct, the climate's ruined and the land grows poorer and uglier every day" Russell. From this quote from Anton Chekhov, one can tell Her situation is untenable, as she can never become a part of the class she longs to join, but neither can she accept her own position.
By accepting an invitation to interact on a temporary basis with the members of the upper class, Mathilde complies with their requirements. Not only do these requirements effectively force the Loisels to retain their lower social status, but they also cause a further loss of income by requiring Monsieur Loisel to spend money he cannot afford to dress Mathilde as she desires. Because women cannot work for success, they must depend upon the confines of marriage to advance their social standing, as Madame Forestier does.
Women succeed in this society only as fashion objects. A crucial symbol for feminist critics is the mirror in which Mathilde admires herself, which represents objectification. Deconstructionist critics might focus on the binary opposition between wealth and poverty, discussing how in this instance poverty is the preferred condition, because through poverty Mathilde sees that she was not poor in her previous circumstance. Loisel is so caught up in her own self-centeredness that she totally forgets about her husband.
She cares for nothing, but the moment she is in. The party ends in the early morning hours and Mrs. Loisel wants to leave in a hurry. She wants the people she met at the party to remember her as was. She conceals her true identity because she is embarrassed for who she really is. In the midst of a returning home after a grand evening she notices she has lost a costly possession…the necklace!!
Loisel look through her dress, shawl, pockets, and retraced all their steps from the party. They realize the inevitable situation they are in and have to replace the necklace. They went from jeweler to jeweler, searching for an indistinguishable replacement.
Loisel had 18, francs left to him by his father. The other half would take three days to acquire from various loan companies and friends. Loisel returns the necklace and does not tell Mrs. Loisel now has to work, along with her husband working late hours.
She takes a job as a servant, cleaning house, washing dishes, and other heavy housework. During this time she becomes somewhat practical. Now she has experienced what is really like to be the wife of a clerk.
The debt would take 10 years to pay back. After the 10 years she finds Mrs. Forrestier walking with her child.
The Necklace study guide contains a biography of Guy de Maupassant, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
This is an example essay on character analysis of “The Necklace”: Guy de Maupassant’ narrative of “The Necklace” is chilly and has a cruel irony effect. The suffering set forth in the story seems to have been needless, due to the fact of misunderstanding and petty pride in Mr. and Mrs. Loisel.
The Woman's Rose, The Necklace, and The Story of an Hour In this essay I will be comparing ‘The Woman’s Rose’ By Olive Schreiner, ‘The Story Of An Hour’ By . For example, of the first seven paragraphs in “The Necklace,” six begin with the word “She,” clarifying that the focus of the story will remain on Mathilde. De Maupassant sets a cynical tone early in the tale though his vocabulary choice: Words such as “suffered,” “poverty,” “wretched,” “ugliness,” “tortured,” and “angry” all appear in the third paragraph.
Theme Analysis of Maupassant's The Necklace Essay Words 3 Pages Guy De Maupassant's short story "The Necklace" remarkably demonstrates how misfortune can lead to self improvement through the character Mathilde Loisel. The Necklace Essay Examples. 88 total results. An Analysis of the Character Mathilde Loisel in The Necklace, a Novel by Guy de Maupassant. words. 2 pages. An Examination of the Irony in The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant and The Gift of the Magi by O. Henry. words. 1 page.